Effectiveness and tolerance of tramadol in cancer pain. A comparative study
with respect to buprenorphine
by
Bono AV, Cuffari S
Service d'Urologie, Hopital di Circolo, Varese, Italie.
Drugs 1997; 53 Suppl 2:40-9
ABSTRACT
Opioid analgesics represent one of the most important tools in a sequential
pharmacological approach to oncological pain relief. They are recommended by the
WHO when nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) no longer provide
adequate analgesia. However, the use of opioids is limited because of their
numerous and often severe adverse effects. This aspect of opioids has motivated
continuous research projects aimed at discovering drugs that can provide maximum
pain relief but with improved tolerability. Tramadol is a new, centrally acting
analgesic with a dual mechanism of action. It shows a selective interaction with
mu receptors, which are responsible for nociception, and has weak
pharmacodynamic activity on other opioid receptors. At the same time, it acts
synergistically on neuroamine transmission by inhibiting synaptic noradrenaline
(norepinephrine) reuptake and inducing intrasynaptic serotonin
(5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) release. From a pharmacokinetic standpoint, tramadol
offers high bioavailability, with similar patterns after oral or parenteral
administration (half-life 5 to 7 hours, time to peak plasma concentration 3.1
hours, and approximately 20% plasma protein binding). Although the efficacy of
tramadol is comparable to that of other drugs with similar modes of action, the
incidence of side effects such as constipation and respiratory depression is
lower. The frequency of euphoria and dysphoria is negligible, resulting in
little risk of abuse or dependence. It therefore seemed appropriate to further
investigate the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol, defined as having only
weak potency, in comparison with a widely used opioid, in oncological pain.
Buprenorphine was selected as an opioid with a potency equivalent to half that
of morphine, but with tolerability that is partially limited by the fact that it
frequently gives rise to adverse reactions considered typical of stronger
opioids. To compare the analgesic effect and tolerability of tramadol and
buprenorphine, 60 patients (44 men, 16 women; average age 61.4 years), all
presenting with advanced tumours, were treated orally in a controlled crossover
trial with randomised sequences. Patients took both drugs, each for a week, with
a 24-hour washout period between treatments. Tramadol was prescribed at the
daily dose of 300mg, orally, and buprenorphine at 0.6 mg/day, as a sublingual
preparation. Assessments were made of Karnofsky performance status and severity
of pain before and during the 4 hours after taking the 2 drugs. Each patient
also completed a daily diary recording the severity of pain 1 hour after the
dose, the evolution of pain during the day and its severity compared with that
on the previous day. They also assessed the duration and quality of sleep. The
Karnofsky index changed little with either treatment, but all other variables
showed worthwhile improvement, indicating the significant analgesic effect of
both drugs. Buprenorphine and tramadol had a similar analgesic effect, although
the improvement with the test drug was significant within 1 hour of
administration (p < 0.05 compared with baseline) and more marked (p < 0.05
on day 2 compared with buprenorpine). At the end of tramadol treatment, sleep
had also improved, both quantitatively and qualitatively (both p < 0.05). The
final assessment was significantly in favour of tramadol as regards efficacy (p
< 0.05) and patient acceptability (p < 0.01). Thus, tramadol was better
tolerated than buprenorphine, and caused fewer and milder adverse reactions.
Only 1 patient discontinued tramadol, compared with 18 using reference therapy.
Tramadol, although theoretically less potent, nevertheless brought about as much
pain relief as the comparator opioid. In conclusion, for this class of drug,
tramadol provides an excellent balance between efficacy and tolerability,
confirming preliminary studies.
CREB
Allodynia
Poppy Tea
Methadone
Ultram abuse?
Buprenorphine
The tramadol option
Abstinence syndrome
Tramadol and analgesia
Tramadol and acute pain
Tramadol: pharmacology
Tramadol versus morphine
Tramadol versus oxycodone
Tramadol as an antidepressant
Tramadol: risk/benefit analysis
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Tramadol, depression and Parkinson's disease
Serotonin, norepinephrine (noradrenaline) and pain

Refs
HOME
HedWeb
BLTC Research
Paradise-Engineering
The Hedonistic Imperative
When Is It Best to Take Crack Cocaine?